Macedonian vs Immigrants from Uganda No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Macedonian
Immigrants from Uganda
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Macedonians
Immigrants from Uganda
12.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Immigrants from Uganda No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,434,178 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.420 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,911,604 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 21.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Macedonian | Immigrants from Uganda |
Minimum | 0.82% | 0.97% |
Maximum | 24.5% | 21.9% |
Range | 23.7% | 20.9% |
Mean | 7.5% | 8.5% |
Median | 6.0% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 10.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Macedonians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Subsaharan African (12.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Liberia (12.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.1%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and South American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Egyptians | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |