Tsimshian vs Choctaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Choctaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Tsimshian
Choctaw
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
23.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Choctaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,620,666 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,280,728 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Choctaw |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 13.3% | 31.9% |
Range | 10.9% | 30.0% |
Mean | 7.1% | 7.2% |
Median | 6.7% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Choctaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Alsatian (5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Hawaiian (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Spaniard (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Ottawa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Colombians | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 26.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.3% |
Spaniards | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.3% |
Alsatians | 23.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.3% |
Tsimshian | 23.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |