Ottawa vs Choctaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Ottawa
Choctaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Ottawa
Choctaw
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
11.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Choctaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,812,692 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,280,728 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.10%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ottawa | Choctaw |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 20.6% | 31.9% |
Range | 18.7% | 30.0% |
Mean | 6.6% | 7.2% |
Median | 5.2% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ottawa and Choctaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Seminole (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Comanche (5.4%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Seminole (5.4%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 10.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.4% |
Comanche | 10.0 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.4% |
Peruvians | 9.6 /100 | #217 | Tragic 5.4% |
Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 5.4% |
South Americans | 8.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 8.5 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.4% |