Iroquois vs Choctaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Iroquois
Choctaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Iroquois
Choctaw
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
20.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Choctaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,447,446 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,280,728 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.93%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.80% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 27.3% | 31.9% |
| Range | 26.5% | 30.0% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 7.2% |
| Median | 5.1% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Choctaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Hawaiian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Ottawa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Spaniards | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.3% |
| Alsatians | 23.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.3% |
| Tsimshian | 23.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
| Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
| Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
| Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
| Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
| Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 10.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.4% |
| Comanche | 10.0 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.4% |