Immigrants from Brazil vs Chickasaw Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Chickasaw
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Chickasaw
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Chickasaw Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,068,748 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,341,260 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.40%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 0.90% |
| Maximum | 21.1% | 13.2% |
| Range | 20.5% | 12.3% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 6.3% |
| Median | 5.1% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil and Chickasaw by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Immigrants from Colombia (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Hungarian (5.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Palestinian (5.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Germany (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Western Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pakistani (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| French Canadians | 88.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Ukrainians | 88.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Mongolians | 88.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 88.2 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 87.7 /100 | #123 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 87.5 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 87.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 86.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Hungarians | 85.1 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 83.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Chickasaw | 82.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Colombians | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Pakistanis | 80.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 80.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Lebanese | 79.9 /100 | #136 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 79.8 /100 | #137 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 79.7 /100 | #138 | Good 5.2% |
| Kenyans | 79.4 /100 | #139 | Good 5.2% |