Immigrants from Australia vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Chickasaw
5.0%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,659,190 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 48.6% | 20.0% |
Range | 47.0% | 18.2% |
Mean | 8.1% | 6.1% |
Median | 5.1% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Serbia (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Filipino (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Canadian (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), New Zealander (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Ukrainian (5.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Mongolians | 97.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Turks | 97.6 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.0% |
New Zealanders | 97.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Filipinos | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.3 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Canadians | 97.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Ukrainians | 97.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 97.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Venezuelans | 96.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 96.7 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 96.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |