Chickasaw vs Polish Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Polish
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Chickasaw
Poles
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Polish Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,812,598 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,300,890 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 13.0%.
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Polish |
Minimum | 0.98% | 0.60% |
Maximum | 36.2% | 44.1% |
Range | 35.2% | 43.5% |
Mean | 9.5% | 6.9% |
Median | 6.6% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Comanche (4.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Indonesian (4.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Congo (4.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (5.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Spanish (5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Indonesia (5.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and Dutch (5.3%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Immigrants | Latvia | 74.6 /100 | #147 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 73.8 /100 | #148 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 73.5 /100 | #149 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Poland | 73.2 /100 | #150 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 72.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.3% |
Spanish | 72.6 /100 | #152 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 5.3% |
Poles | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 5.3% |
Dutch | 72.0 /100 | #156 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 71.5 /100 | #157 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | France | 71.0 /100 | #158 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 66.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.3% |
Bangladeshis | 65.8 /100 | #160 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 63.7 /100 | #161 | Good 5.3% |