Chickasaw vs Cuban Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Cuban
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Chickasaw
Cubans
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Cuban Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,812,598 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 388,133,736 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.344 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Cuban |
Minimum | 0.98% | 0.30% |
Maximum | 36.2% | 12.8% |
Range | 35.2% | 12.5% |
Mean | 9.5% | 4.8% |
Median | 6.6% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Cubans by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Comanche (4.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Indonesian (4.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Congo (4.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Lumbee (4.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Congo (4.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (4.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and Osage (4.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Creek | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.9% |