Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Asia Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Asia
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Asia
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
78.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Asia Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,812,598 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,194,838 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%.
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Asia |
Minimum | 0.98% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 36.2% | 10.8% |
Range | 35.2% | 9.0% |
Mean | 9.5% | 5.3% |
Median | 6.6% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 1.4% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Comanche (4.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Indonesian (4.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Congo (4.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and Tongan (4.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Laos (5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Finnish (5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Chilean (5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (5.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and New Zealander (5.3%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Immigrants | Panama | 81.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 81.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.3% |
Celtics | 80.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 80.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.3% |
Chileans | 79.7 /100 | #138 | Good 5.3% |
Finns | 79.0 /100 | #139 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 78.6 /100 | #140 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Asia | 78.4 /100 | #141 | Good 5.3% |
Turks | 76.2 /100 | #142 | Good 5.3% |
New Zealanders | 76.1 /100 | #143 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.0 /100 | #144 | Good 5.3% |
Canadians | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 5.3% |
Irish | 74.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 74.6 /100 | #147 | Good 5.3% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 73.8 /100 | #148 | Good 5.3% |