Ute vs Pakistani Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Pakistani
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Pakistanis
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Pakistani Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,174,379 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 42.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 9.6% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 90.4% | 97.5% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 23.5% |
| Median | 25.0% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.5% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 20.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 20.0% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are English (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |