Spanish American Indian vs Bhutanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Bhutanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Bhutanese
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Bhutanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,141,857 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 38.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 6.9% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 47.0% | 31.2% |
Range | 40.0% | 28.3% |
Mean | 15.2% | 8.9% |
Median | 12.4% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |