Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Chilean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Chileans
31.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,583,448 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 31.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,944,579 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 109.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Chilean |
Minimum | 11.0% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 48.3% |
Range | 89.0% | 43.2% |
Mean | 46.3% | 16.2% |
Median | 37.8% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.4% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.8% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 34.5% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.2% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.7% | 9.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Lumbee (30.7%, a difference of 2.9%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 3.4%), Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 3.7%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 12.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |