Ghanaian vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Celtic
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ghanaians
Celtics
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Celtic Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,052,408 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,177,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 8.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ghanaian | Celtic |
Minimum | 1.1% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 41.8% | 70.9% |
Range | 40.7% | 67.6% |
Mean | 16.7% | 25.7% |
Median | 16.8% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 15.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 34.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 14.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Osage (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |