Immigrants from Nigeria vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nigeria
Moroccan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nigeria
Moroccans
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
36.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,424,255 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nigeria | Moroccan |
Minimum | 1.1% | 10.5% |
Maximum | 51.4% | 53.5% |
Range | 50.2% | 43.0% |
Mean | 19.1% | 24.5% |
Median | 19.4% | 20.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nigeria and Moroccans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cuba (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |