Swedish vs Iranian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Iranian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Iranians
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Iranian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,313,222 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,618,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.54%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swedish | Iranian |
Minimum | 3.4% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 31.0% |
Range | 63.3% | 27.5% |
Mean | 13.6% | 9.7% |
Median | 10.8% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 11.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Iranians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |