Swedish vs Bolivian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Bolivian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Bolivians
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Bolivian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,313,222 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,615,505 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.86%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swedish | Bolivian |
Minimum | 3.4% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 41.2% |
Range | 63.3% | 40.1% |
Mean | 13.6% | 10.7% |
Median | 10.8% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Bolivians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |