Norwegian vs Iranian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Iranian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Iranians
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Iranian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,481,223 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,618,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Iranian |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 55.6% | 31.0% |
| Range | 54.6% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 9.7% |
| Median | 11.1% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Iranians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |