Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Immigrants from El Salvador
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Immigrants from El Salvador
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,470,286 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,675,141 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 0.50%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Minimum | 0.49% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 68.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.9% | 96.7% |
Mean | 17.6% | 17.2% |
Median | 16.8% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.7% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.5% | 18.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Immigrants from El Salvador by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |