South American vs Polish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
South American
Polish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
South Americans
Poles
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Polish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,993,980 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.17%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American | Polish |
| Minimum | 9.4% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 46.7% | 77.8% |
| Range | 37.3% | 72.7% |
| Mean | 20.2% | 19.6% |
| Median | 19.5% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.4% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Poles by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |