Immigrants from Hungary vs Polish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
Polish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
Poles
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs Polish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,674,304 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.98%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | Polish |
| Minimum | 11.9% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 77.8% |
| Range | 88.1% | 72.7% |
| Mean | 31.2% | 19.6% |
| Median | 23.7% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.2% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.0% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.9% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.3% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary and Poles by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Uruguayan (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |