Immigrants from Western Asia vs Polish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Asia
Polish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Western Asia
Poles
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Asia vs Polish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,084,795 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.40%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Asia | Polish |
Minimum | 6.4% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 53.6% | 77.8% |
Range | 47.2% | 72.7% |
Mean | 20.1% | 19.6% |
Median | 19.3% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.8% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.2% | 21.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Asia and Poles by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |