Korean vs Pima Female Poverty
COMPARE
Korean
Pima
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Koreans
Pima
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Pima Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,221,953 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,212 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 98.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 30.9% | 79.5% |
| Range | 30.3% | 73.8% |
| Mean | 10.4% | 28.6% |
| Median | 9.8% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 37.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 19.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 15.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Koreans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.3%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |