Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Turkish Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Turkish
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Turks
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Turkish Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,424,226 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,656,534 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 0.55%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Turkish |
Minimum | 0.44% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 20.9% |
Range | 49.6% | 18.0% |
Mean | 11.2% | 8.3% |
Median | 9.2% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 8.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Turks by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Asian (10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Croatia (10.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Austria (10.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Serbia (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |