Pima vs Osage Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Osage
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Pima
Osage
20.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Osage Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,152,261 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,587,587 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 16.5%, a difference of 22.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Osage |
Minimum | 6.5% | 5.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 93.5% | 95.0% |
Mean | 37.5% | 31.8% |
Median | 28.6% | 23.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.7% | 40.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.7% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.2% | 24.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.5% | 23.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Osage by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Native/Alaskan (19.6%, a difference of 2.7%), Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 4.4%), Cajun (19.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and Yuman (21.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.61%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.91%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |