Pima vs Native/Alaskan Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Native/Alaskan
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Pima
Natives/Alaskans
20.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Native/Alaskan Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,152,261 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,255,067 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 2.7%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 75.0% |
| Range | 93.5% | 70.7% |
| Mean | 37.5% | 31.7% |
| Median | 28.6% | 29.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.7% | 41.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.7% | 22.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.2% | 15.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.5% | 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Natives/Alaskans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 4.4%), Cajun (19.1%, a difference of 5.7%), Yuman (21.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and Tohono O'odham (21.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 1.7%), Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 1.9%), Cajun (19.1%, a difference of 2.8%), Colville (18.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and Kiowa (18.3%, a difference of 7.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 25.1% |