Choctaw vs Osage Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Osage
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Choctaw
Osage
17.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Osage Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,568,106 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,587,587 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 16.5%, a difference of 3.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Osage |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 95.0% | 95.0% |
| Mean | 30.9% | 31.8% |
| Median | 23.9% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.3% | 40.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.8% | 23.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.3% | 24.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.1% | 23.6% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Osage by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 0.72%), Creek (16.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Central American Indian (17.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.61%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.91%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |