Nicaraguan vs Nepalese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Nicaraguan
Nepalese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Nicaraguans
Nepalese
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nicaraguan vs Nepalese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,582,633 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,519,269 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 0.24%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nicaraguan | Nepalese |
Minimum | 2.4% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 35.3% | 31.6% |
Range | 32.9% | 26.5% |
Mean | 15.5% | 16.0% |
Median | 14.6% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 19.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Nicaraguans and Nepalese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Immigrants from Sudan (15.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Sudanese (15.2%, a difference of 0.37%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (15.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |