Native Hawaiian vs English Poverty
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
English
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Native Hawaiians
English
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
POVERTY
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs English Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,880,799 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,762,394 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 2.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native Hawaiian | English |
Minimum | 2.7% | 0.27% |
Maximum | 30.7% | 69.9% |
Range | 28.0% | 69.6% |
Mean | 11.9% | 15.1% |
Median | 10.7% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and English by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Slavic (11.5%, a difference of 0.45%), Scottish (11.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.87%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Czechoslovakian (11.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |