Laotian vs English Poverty
COMPARE
Laotian
English
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Laotians
English
11.6%
POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
POVERTY
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs English Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,750,373 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,762,394 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 2.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | English |
| Minimum | 0.072% | 0.27% |
| Maximum | 28.0% | 69.9% |
| Range | 27.9% | 69.6% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 15.1% |
| Median | 10.5% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and English by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (11.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Scottish (11.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.90%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |