Native Hawaiian vs Australian Poverty
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Australian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Australians
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs Australian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,880,799 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,020,538 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native Hawaiian | Australian |
Minimum | 2.7% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 30.7% | 41.9% |
Range | 28.0% | 41.4% |
Mean | 11.9% | 11.4% |
Median | 10.7% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and Australians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |