Mongolian vs Pennsylvania German Family Poverty
COMPARE
Mongolian
Pennsylvania German
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Mongolians
Pennsylvania Germans
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Pennsylvania German Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,209,736 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,657,746 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mongolian | Pennsylvania German |
Minimum | 0.58% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 23.4% | 71.9% |
Range | 22.8% | 71.1% |
Mean | 8.0% | 12.1% |
Median | 7.5% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 11.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Pennsylvania Germans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |