Mexican American Indian vs Celtic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Celtic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Celtics
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Celtic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,470,286 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 16.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Celtic |
Minimum | 0.49% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 68.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.9% | 97.8% |
Mean | 17.6% | 15.9% |
Median | 16.8% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.7% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.5% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (13.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |