Mexican American Indian vs Central American Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Central American
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Central Americans
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Central American Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,505,642 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,069,914 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 2.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Central American |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 51.0% | 62.9% |
Range | 49.9% | 61.2% |
Mean | 15.9% | 17.4% |
Median | 14.6% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 19.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Central Americans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and Chickasaw (14.7%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |