Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Bahamas Poverty
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Immigrants from Bahamas
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Immigrants from Bahamas
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Bahamas Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,505,642 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,609,154 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 3.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | Immigrants from Bahamas |
Minimum | 1.1% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 51.0% | 38.4% |
Range | 49.9% | 35.0% |
Mean | 15.9% | 15.8% |
Median | 14.6% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 18.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians and Immigrants from Bahamas by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Cape Verdean (14.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and Cherokee (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from West Indies (14.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Barbadian (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Chickasaw (14.7%, a difference of 0.97%), and Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |