Uruguayan vs Celtic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Celtic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Uruguayans
Celtics
13.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
39.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
189th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Celtic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,759,999 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 0.99%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Celtic |
Minimum | 2.5% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 24.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 21.6% | 97.8% |
Mean | 11.4% | 15.9% |
Median | 12.3% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Celtics by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Hawaiian (13.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Venezuela (13.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Portugal (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Cameroon (13.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (13.5%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (13.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |
Kenyans | 43.8 /100 | #183 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 43.2 /100 | #184 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 42.0 /100 | #185 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 41.5 /100 | #186 | Average 13.6% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 41.0 /100 | #187 | Average 13.6% |
Hawaiians | 39.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 13.6% |
Uruguayans | 39.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 13.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |