Malaysian vs Moroccan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Malaysian
Moroccan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Malaysians
Moroccans
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Moroccan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,983,571 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,724,575 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 0.080%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Moroccan |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 38.2% | 51.5% |
| Range | 36.7% | 47.1% |
| Mean | 15.2% | 16.6% |
| Median | 14.8% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Moroccans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.49%), Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.80%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.58%), Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.71%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |