Latvian vs Palestinian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Palestinian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Palestinians
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Palestinian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,777,893 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,894,692 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034 and weighted average of 19.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Palestinian |
Minimum | 6.0% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 90.7% | 53.6% |
Range | 84.7% | 51.0% |
Mean | 24.7% | 21.7% |
Median | 18.5% | 19.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 28.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.6% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Palestinians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Macedonian (18.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Cypriot (19.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Lithuanian (19.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Cambodian (19.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |