Latvian vs Immigrants from Asia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Immigrants from Asia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Immigrants from Asia
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Immigrants from Asia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,777,893 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,712,278 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.528 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 2.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Immigrants from Asia |
Minimum | 6.0% | 5.9% |
Maximum | 90.7% | 30.3% |
Range | 84.7% | 24.4% |
Mean | 24.7% | 16.3% |
Median | 18.5% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.6% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Immigrants from Asia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Macedonian (18.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from North Macedonia (18.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (18.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |