Latvian vs Immigrants from Philippines Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Immigrants from Philippines
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Immigrants from Philippines
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Immigrants from Philippines Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,777,893 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,433,577 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 2.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Immigrants from Philippines |
Minimum | 6.0% | 7.7% |
Maximum | 90.7% | 61.4% |
Range | 84.7% | 53.7% |
Mean | 24.7% | 18.5% |
Median | 18.5% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 19.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.6% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Immigrants from Philippines by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Macedonian (18.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Asia (18.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (18.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |