Korean vs Immigrants from Serbia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Korean
Immigrants from Serbia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Koreans
Immigrants from Serbia
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Immigrants from Serbia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,221,953 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,723,325 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Immigrants from Serbia |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 30.9% | 29.2% |
| Range | 30.3% | 27.7% |
| Mean | 10.4% | 10.9% |
| Median | 9.8% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Immigrants from Serbia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (12.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |