Japanese vs Immigrants from South America Family Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from South America
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from South America
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
18.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from South America Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,852,848 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,267,691 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 4.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from South America |
| Minimum | 0.66% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 45.9% | 18.4% |
| Range | 45.3% | 15.1% |
| Mean | 14.7% | 9.5% |
| Median | 11.0% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Immigrants from South America by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Aleut (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lebanon (9.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Sierra Leonean (9.5%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (9.5%, a difference of 0.93%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 9.4% |
| Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |