Japanese vs Alsatian Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Alsatian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Alsatians
13.3%
POVERTY
3.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
POVERTY
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Alsatian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,091,915 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.597 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,679,902 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.428 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 0.52%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Alsatian |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 17.5% |
| Range | 96.9% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 18.8% | 9.9% |
| Median | 14.9% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.9% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Alsatians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Nonimmigrants (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Thailand (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Bermudan (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Micronesia (13.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Africa (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (13.4%, a difference of 0.18%), American (13.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.4% |
| German Russians | 2.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Marshallese | 2.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Alaska Natives | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.5% |