Hmong vs Alsatian Poverty
COMPARE
Hmong
Alsatian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Hmong
Alsatians
12.8%
POVERTY
15.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
POVERTY
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Alsatian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,672,093 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.337 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,679,902 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.428 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 4.4%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hmong | Alsatian |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 28.0% | 17.5% |
| Range | 24.7% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 13.1% | 9.9% |
| Median | 12.5% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and Alsatians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Uruguay (12.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Western Asia (12.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Tsimshian (13.0%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Micronesia (13.4%, a difference of 0.040%), American (13.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Thailand (13.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (13.3%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 15.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 12.8% |
| Hmong | 15.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
| Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |