Immigrants from Uganda vs Alsatian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Alsatian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Alsatians
12.8%
POVERTY
16.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
POVERTY
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Alsatian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,970,249 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,679,902 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.428 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 4.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Alsatian |
Minimum | 0.63% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 38.4% | 17.5% |
Range | 37.8% | 14.6% |
Mean | 13.5% | 9.9% |
Median | 12.4% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Alsatians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from Uruguay (12.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hmong (12.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Western Asia (12.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Tsimshian (13.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are American (13.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Thailand (13.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (13.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Japanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Uganda | 16.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 15.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 12.8% |
Hmong | 15.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |