Jamaican vs Iroquois Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jamaican
Iroquois
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Jamaicans
Iroquois
15.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Iroquois Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,594,174 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jamaican | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 5.3% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 29.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 24.5% | 95.3% |
| Mean | 15.4% | 22.4% |
| Median | 15.0% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Iroquois by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Jamaica (15.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |