Immigrants from Belize vs Iroquois Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belize
Iroquois
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belize
Iroquois
16.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belize vs Iroquois Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,293,638 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 16.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 2.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belize | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 35.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 29.7% | 95.3% |
| Mean | 17.0% | 22.4% |
| Median | 16.3% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 18.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belize and Iroquois by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belize are Inupiat (16.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Indonesian (16.4%, a difference of 0.55%), Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.63%), Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.77%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |