Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Iroquois Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,845,930 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 41.0%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Hong Kong	Iroquois
Minimum	1.3%	4.7%
Maximum	18.6%	100.0%
Range	17.3%	95.3%
Mean	9.4%	22.4%
Median	9.5%	16.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.2%	12.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	10.9%	25.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.7%	13.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.4%	19.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.4%	18.8%

Similar Demographics by Female Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.58%), Bulgarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.99%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 10.5%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 10.5%
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 10.9%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 11.0%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 11.0%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.9 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 11.1%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 11.1%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	99.9 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 11.2%
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 11.2%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 11.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 11.3%
Lithuanians	99.8 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 11.4%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 11.4%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.8 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 11.5%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 11.5%

Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.76%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Mexican American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 15.6%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 15.6%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 15.6%
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 15.7%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 15.7%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 15.8%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 15.8%
Iroquois	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 15.8%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 15.9%
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #271	Tragic 15.9%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #272	Tragic 15.9%
Haitians	0.0 /100 \| #273	Tragic 15.9%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 15.9%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 16.0%
Central Americans	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 16.0%