Italian vs Maltese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Italian
Maltese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Italians
Maltese
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Maltese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 551,674,054 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,909,171 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 4.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Italian | Maltese |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 80.5% |
Range | 98.0% | 79.3% |
Mean | 14.4% | 18.7% |
Median | 10.7% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 22.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 14.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 14.2% |
Demographics Similar to Italians and Maltese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Luxembourger (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and Czech (14.2%, a difference of 0.80%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.8%, a difference of 0.98%), Russian (13.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Lithuanian (13.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Moldova (13.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |