Chinese vs Maltese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Chinese
Maltese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Chinese
Maltese
12.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Maltese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,581,051 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,909,171 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 11.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Maltese |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 53.8% | 80.5% |
Range | 51.4% | 79.3% |
Mean | 15.2% | 18.7% |
Median | 12.8% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 22.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 14.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 14.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |