Italian vs Cambodian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Italian
Cambodian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Italians
Cambodians
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Cambodian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 551,674,054 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,087,576 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 1.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Italian | Cambodian |
Minimum | 2.0% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 28.9% |
Range | 98.0% | 23.4% |
Mean | 14.4% | 13.9% |
Median | 10.7% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Italians and Cambodians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Luxembourger (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Scandinavian (14.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Europe (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Zimbabwean (14.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |